What has allowed the long-term anime clubs to survive?
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 2:52 am
There are a bunch of anime clubs now that are over 20 years old now (in old-school terms, I guess this would be the same as the C/FO chapter clubs that still existed in the early 2000s, like Denver Anime International). What allowed these clubs to survive when others have died out?
A lot of the younger ones are college clubs -- my guess for them is that since there is a natural mechanism for getting new members in as incoming freshmen arrive each year and there's no need to worry about a meeting space, there's greater stability. However, you also have members leaving every year as they graduate, so it can't just be that. Are there certain policies or practices that have made some college clubs more durable than others?
The community clubs like the Philadelphia Animation Society or C/FO LA are especially fascinating to me. With the C/FO LA, I think their long-term relationship with the LA Science Fiction Society helps here, because LASFS has a clubhouse that they own outright, which means there's less chance of the C/FO disbanding because they don't have anywhere to meet, provided they maintain their relationship with LASFS. (Are there any anime clubs out there that have taken a page out of the LASFS handbook and own their own clubhouse?)
The other thing I've noticed with especially long-lived community clubs is that they often seem to have an anchor-fan who serves as the club's institutional memory, and who is willing to play a more active role in case of an emergency or who has always played an active role. (Fred Patten of C/FO LA and Bill Thomas of the Philadelphia Animation Society both spring to mind.) On the other hand, though, there are clubs that seem to have struggled due to long-term superfans alienating new members and making it harder for clubs to adapt to change; what is it that ends up making certain long-term club attendees helpful and others hurtful towards the club's long-term stability?
Is there some other type of club or club practice that seems especially helpful?
A lot of the younger ones are college clubs -- my guess for them is that since there is a natural mechanism for getting new members in as incoming freshmen arrive each year and there's no need to worry about a meeting space, there's greater stability. However, you also have members leaving every year as they graduate, so it can't just be that. Are there certain policies or practices that have made some college clubs more durable than others?
The community clubs like the Philadelphia Animation Society or C/FO LA are especially fascinating to me. With the C/FO LA, I think their long-term relationship with the LA Science Fiction Society helps here, because LASFS has a clubhouse that they own outright, which means there's less chance of the C/FO disbanding because they don't have anywhere to meet, provided they maintain their relationship with LASFS. (Are there any anime clubs out there that have taken a page out of the LASFS handbook and own their own clubhouse?)
The other thing I've noticed with especially long-lived community clubs is that they often seem to have an anchor-fan who serves as the club's institutional memory, and who is willing to play a more active role in case of an emergency or who has always played an active role. (Fred Patten of C/FO LA and Bill Thomas of the Philadelphia Animation Society both spring to mind.) On the other hand, though, there are clubs that seem to have struggled due to long-term superfans alienating new members and making it harder for clubs to adapt to change; what is it that ends up making certain long-term club attendees helpful and others hurtful towards the club's long-term stability?
Is there some other type of club or club practice that seems especially helpful?