Woooo~ Linux~. And I say that as one of the guys who seconded the motion of starting the thread.
I am still a relative newbie to it; or, at least, I feel that way. I have a lot of colleagues and friends who have been using it for at least 10 years, so my paltry 7 years makes me feel kinda small. I am also relatively distro-agnostic (I'll try anything once!), so I still experiment with different distributions if it is something neat or a re-vamped toolkit to fit a need or curiosity. At home, I prefer Debian-based distributions because of the stability combined with a little bit of modification required for multimedia stuff. At work though, if you talk to lots of industry standard folks, there's a huge preference for Red Hat-based OS. For my home machines, I use the following:
Home Office - Debian Stable
Personal Laptop - Xubuntu (need to migrate it to the latest LTS)
Distros I am experimenting with - KaliLinux, CrunchPwn (#pwn!)
Distros I have used at home in the past:
Fedora/CentOS/Red Hat
SuSE/openSUSE
Kubuntu
CrunchBang (#!)
... and there's got to be a few more i am forgetting.
greg wrote: If I was to build a media viewing box for my TV, what's the best Linux flavor?
Loaded question. If you want things to work almost immediately out of the box, then something like Linux Mint or a version of Ubuntu is probably one of the best places to start. I recommend those because of Ubuntu's reputation of ease of use, especially for someone who is still new or learning Linux, and most importantly, that they include a lot of the most common-but-proprietary media codec/plugins/whatever, like Flash. Video support, through either a native player or third party like VLC, is pretty good, regardless of distribution. When it comes to whether or not I want to "fix" things or not after work/on a weekend, I would lean towards these. There is another Ubuntu-based distribution, called MediBuntu or something like that - which was one of the original Media PC Linux distributions. I don't know if it's still actively developed or anything like that but could be a viable option as well.
That said, Linux can be all of what you make out of it. I have complained about how long it took for me to configure an old SuSE box for multimedia playback and after a few months, something was updated and borked it. I just didn't have the passion to figure out the chain (what broke it, how to fix it, etc. etc. etc.). That's no knock against SuSE - it would be a top contender for a server environment any day of the week - but it just wasn't right for my needs. I have a friend, who guided me along getting SuSE configured for multimedia and as far as I recall, still swears by it and never ran into the issues I had.
The part I get hung up on when it comes to using a Linux media server is the hardware. I am still paranoid about hardware support for non-tried-and-true peripheral components. However, talking with a friend of mine the other weekend, stuff like having a remote control could be bypassed in favor of a wireless mouse with the RF piece in the computer is done via USB instead of putting faith into a Bluetooth remote and picking a distribution with janky Bluetooth support.
yusaku wrote:Yet, I also have the Solaris operating system that has copy protection to avoid data loss. I think I will give my old Solaris machines a good look over tomorrow because they have been doing absolutely nothing. Anyone got any ideas for uses for four legacy Sun servers sitting in a 42U cabinet?
Depends on how legacy Solaris is? Are the servers using SPARC processors or are they x86 compatible chips?
My initial reaction is web server and linked database but having no idea what the actual hardware layout is, I don't know if that really makes any sense. My exposure to Solaris is extremely limited. I've only known it to be used in either webhosting or finance industries and even then, it was legacy when I got there.